| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
1. Class project - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
24 hours left.
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.31 17:32:44
|
2. Indirect nerf to drones: anti-drone batteries - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Freelancer117 wrote: Rebalance defender missiles to shoot down drones and bombs Or just use light missiles for drones. Not sure what to do about the bombs though.
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.31 13:05:25
|
3. Class project - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kitsune Rei wrote: This seems like a trap. Is it a trap? In Eve it's always a trap
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.29 22:45:44
|
4. Class project - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marsha Mallow wrote: Done. I like that you allowed for activity across space, but would have liked to see trade on your ISK making activities list. Puttng WiS at the top of future developments is also a bit leading. GL with the project either w...
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.29 22:44:55
|
5. Class project - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Still open for a few more days
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.29 18:34:56
|
6. Class project - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: You forgot trading too :) I did consider it but left it out because I wanted to ignore station traders. While I could be wrong I don't know anyone who does trading as a part of their main toon's income. Quote: Well, the project mi...
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.27 16:47:32
|
7. Class project - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thank you to the 22 people who have filled it out so far.
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.25 15:10:19
|
8. Your thoughts of the new mining drone. Coming soon? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Maybe allow Rorqs in HS if the owner has standing with an empire of 4.0 or better and then it could only use the gates in that empire's space. Would keep the number of people using rorqs in hs down.
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.25 15:06:42
|
9. Class project - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
glad you know my professor's assignment better than I do. would you mind doing my homework for me?
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.25 04:35:21
|
10. Class project - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
the results are't the point in this particular exercise. but thank you for pointing out my error on the lack of low sec option on the survey. I will correct that if I recycle it.
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.25 03:09:27
|
11. Class project - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Working on project of a stats class and need players to fill out an eve related servey found here Should only take a few minutes. Thank you in advance.
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.25 01:32:33
|
12. Give ships that can use a covert ops cloak a local delay - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Xackattack Avianson wrote: The idea is simple, give ships that can fit a covert ops cloak a delay from appearing in local chat. Doesn't have to be a long delay, 10 seconds would be more than enough Local chat is being abused for easy intel an...
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.12 02:00:37
|
13. Rule Revision - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Danika Princip wrote: Sure, but only if you also require that anyone mining outside of a newbie starter system is also in a player corp. It's easy to gank barges as is and a barge isn't committing an aggressive action against you.
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.12 01:58:45
|
14. Rule Revision - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ima Wreckyou wrote: Or you could just purchase a mining permit as it is required by the Code in New Order territory (Highsec). After all they are only 10mil ISK and valid for a full year! Doesn't look like this has anything to do with you se...
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.12 01:09:03
|
15. Rule Revision - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Was thinking today about the practice of miner bumping and thought a slight revision to the rule might be in order. Allow players to bump miners only if they are in a player run corp so miners would have recourse against the bumper. There really s...
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.03.12 00:03:18
|
16. Diamond Dust. - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Recruitment still open
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.01.23 16:08:07
|
17. Diamond Dust. - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
bump
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.01.21 03:28:44
|
18. New player Looking for mining Corp Hi Sec - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Vioxia Dalur wrote: Hi Folks, I used to play eve back in 2006 with an old account which i cant remember the log in details, new email adress and such, however I'm looking for a friendly active corp thats into mining and such. I'm a 32 year o...
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.01.20 03:45:34
|
19. Diamond Dust. - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Diamond Dust is looking for new members. We are looking for miners and explorers to fill our ranks and increase our produciton capablities. Now what do you get out of joining us? We pay you to come on corp mining ops. We are planning a discount b...
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.01.19 23:25:56
|
20. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I wrote on a year or two ago and put some more thought into it. Originally I said that between 1/4 and 1/2 of the stations should be not be available to be docked in to the aggressor at random. The only exception to this would be the aggressor's d...
- by Naj Panora - at 2016.01.19 23:19:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |